Prompt Injection: Hacking Gemini’s Long-Term Memory

As artificial intelligence continues to evolve, so do the tactics employed by malicious actors seeking to exploit these advanced systems. A recent demonstration by researcher Johann Rehberger has unveiled a new method of prompt injection that targets Google’s Gemini chatbot, revealing vulnerabilities in its long-term memory capabilities. This innovative yet concerning approach allows attackers to manipulate the chatbot into storing false information, effectively corrupting its memory and undermining its reliability. In this article, we delve into the intricacies of this attack, examining how indirect prompt injections work and the implications they hold for the future of AI security.

Aspect	Details
What is the Hack?	A method using prompt injection to corrupt Gemini’s long-term memory.
Researcher	Johann Rehberger
Date of Discovery	February 11, 2025
Type of Attack	Indirect prompt injection and delayed tool invocation.
How It Works	Malicious prompts in documents trick Gemini into saving false information in its long-term memory.
Example of Malicious Instructions	A document instructs Gemini to save data if the user responds with trigger words like ‘yes’ or ‘sure’.
Consequences	Gemini may act on false information in future sessions, leading to misinformation.
Previous Vulnerabilities	Similar attacks have affected Microsoft Copilot and ChatGPT, showing a pattern of exploitation.
Google’s Response	They claim the threat is low risk and users are informed when long-term memories are added.
User Awareness	Users can remove unauthorized memories, but may overlook warnings from Gemini.

Understanding Prompt Injection in AI

Prompt injection is a technique used by hackers to manipulate chatbots into performing unintended actions. It works by sneaking in harmful instructions disguised as normal prompts that the chatbot cannot resist. For example, when a user asks a chatbot to summarize an email, a prompt injection could trick the bot into revealing sensitive information instead. This can lead to serious security issues, especially if chatbots handle private data.

The vulnerability of chatbots like Google’s Gemini and OpenAI’s ChatGPT comes from their eagerness to follow instructions. Developers work hard to fix these problems, but hackers constantly find new ways to bypass security measures. Understanding how prompt injection works is essential for both developers and users to stay safe and protect their information from malicious attacks.

The Rise of Indirect Prompt Injections

Indirect prompt injection is becoming a common tactic in the world of AI hacking. It involves using untrusted content—like a malicious email or document—to trick chatbots into executing harmful commands. This technique can lead to severe data breaches, where sensitive information is leaked without the user’s knowledge. For instance, an attacker may send a document that causes a chatbot to search for and share confidential emails.

Hackers have developed clever methods to exploit these vulnerabilities. By conditioning instructions based on user actions, they can bypass safety barriers. For instance, instead of directly telling the chatbot to perform a harmful task, they manipulate it to act only when the user engages in a specific behavior, making it harder for developers to detect and prevent these attacks.

The Role of Long-Term Memory in Chatbots

Long-term memory in chatbots allows them to remember user preferences and details across sessions, making interactions smoother. However, this feature can also be exploited by attackers. If a hacker manages to implant false memories, the chatbot may act on incorrect information in future conversations. For example, an attacker could trick a chatbot into remembering that a user is much older than they actually are, leading to bizarre or inappropriate responses.

Developers have placed restrictions on how chatbots can modify long-term memories to safeguard users. But as demonstrated by recent hacking attempts, these defenses can be bypassed. Users must be aware of the potential risks involved with chatbots that have long-term memory features, as they can inadvertently store harmful or misleading information.

The Cleverness of Delayed Tool Invocation

Delayed tool invocation is a sophisticated technique that hackers use to manipulate chatbots like Gemini. By embedding hidden instructions within a document, an attacker can trick the bot into executing a harmful command only if the user performs a specific action. This clever tactic allows the hacker to exploit the chatbot’s natural behavior of following user prompts, making it difficult for developers to identify the attack.

For example, if a user asks the chatbot to summarize a document, the malicious content might include instructions to save certain information based on the user’s response. If the user replies with a simple word like ‘yes’, the chatbot might mistakenly store that information as a memory, unknowingly putting the user at risk.

Evaluating the Risks of Memory Corruption

Memory corruption in AI chatbots poses a significant risk to users. When a chatbot incorrectly remembers details about a user or their preferences, it can lead to misinformation and confusion. For instance, if a chatbot believes a user is a flat earther, it might provide biased information that reinforces this false belief. This can have wider implications, especially when the chatbot is used for research or decision-making.

While developers like Google argue that the threat is low, the potential for misinformation is a serious concern. Users should be vigilant and pay attention to any changes made to their chatbot’s memory. Regularly reviewing and managing these memories can help prevent unauthorized information from influencing future interactions and ensure a more accurate and safe user experience.

Google’s Response to Hacking Attempts

In response to the recent hacking attempts, Google has reassured users that they are taking steps to enhance security. They maintain that the overall threat from such attacks is low, as they require the user to engage with untrusted content. However, the effectiveness of their measures is still under scrutiny, especially considering the clever methods hackers use to bypass these safeguards.

Google has implemented some mitigations, such as limiting the ability of chatbots to generate markdown links that could be used for data exfiltration. Yet, critics argue that merely treating symptoms rather than addressing the root cause of indirect prompt injections may not be sufficient. Users must remain informed and cautious while using AI chatbots to protect their information.

Frequently Asked Questions

Summary

A new technique called prompt injection has been discovered that allows hackers to corrupt the memory of Google’s chatbot, Gemini. Researcher Johann Rehberger demonstrated how a malicious document could trick Gemini into saving false information as long-term memories, which would affect future interactions. This method exploits the chatbot’s eagerness to follow instructions, making it vulnerable to attacks. Despite Google implementing some security measures, the underlying issue of the chatbot’s gullibility remains unaddressed. Users are warned to be cautious when engaging with untrusted documents, as this can lead to misinformation being stored in their chat history.

---